Filters
Cases reviewed
48
In current filter
Allergy status documented
89.6%
Target ≥ 90%
In prescribing system
83.3%
Target ≥ 90%
Consistent across records
68.8%
Target ≥ 90%
Reaction details documented
76.9%
Target ≥ 90%
In discharge communication
79.2%
Target ≥ 90%
Criteria meeting target
2/21
Numerically-computed audit criteria only. Others need manual review.
Criteria below target
19
See Findings and Improvement tabs.
Most common documentation gap
Severity not documented
38 cases in current filter.
Compliance by criterion
% of cases meeting each computed audit criterion
Documentation by ward / unit
% with allergy status documented
Allergy documentation — run chart
Weekly compliance with median and target
Pareto — common allergy documentation gaps
Where documentation is falling short
Allergy status group distribution
All cases in current filter
Suggested improvement opportunities
Editable in the Improvement tab
Severity not documented — 38 cases. Consider EPR mandatory fields, allergy coding, pharmacy medicines reconciliation and discharge template prompts.
Reaction details missing — 37 cases. Consider EPR mandatory fields, allergy coding, pharmacy medicines reconciliation and discharge template prompts.
Inconsistent across records — 15 cases. Consider EPR mandatory fields, allergy coding, pharmacy medicines reconciliation and discharge template prompts.
Not visible at prescribing — 14 cases. Consider EPR mandatory fields, allergy coding, pharmacy medicines reconciliation and discharge template prompts.
Safety prompt
Any immediate allergy or medication safety concern (suspected anaphylaxis, prescribing error, missed alert, wrong-drug administration) identified during this audit must be escalated through local clinical, pharmacy and governance pathways, including incident reporting where appropriate. Do not rely on this audit tool for urgent escalation.